MR Holdings, Ltd. v. Sheriff Bajar

G.R. No. 138104, 11 April 2002 FACTS: ADB extended a loan to Marcopper under a Principal Loan Agreement and Complementary Loan Agreement. A Support and Standby Credit Agreement was also executed between ADB and Placer Dome (owner of 40% of Marcopper), whereby the latter agreed to provide with a cash flow support for the payment [...]

By |2020-02-28T08:06:01+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on MR Holdings, Ltd. v. Sheriff Bajar

Hahn v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 113074, 22 January 1997 FACTS: Alfred Hahn is a Filipino citizen doing business under the name and style "Hahn-Manila." Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (BMW) is a nonresident foreign corporation existing under the laws of the former Federal Republic of Germany, with principal office at Munich, Germany. In 1963, Hahn executed in favor of [...]

By |2020-02-28T07:59:50+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Hahn v. Court of Appeals

Marubeni Nederland B.V. v. Tensuan

G.R. No. 61950, 28 September 1990 FACTS: Petitioner Marubeni Nederland B.V. and D.B. Teodoro Development Corporation (DBT for short) entered into a contract whereby petitioner agreed to supply the necessary equipment, technical know-how and the general design of the construction of DBT's lime plant at the in Iloilo for a total contract price of US$5,400,000.00 [...]

By |2020-02-28T07:57:59+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Marubeni Nederland B.V. v. Tensuan

Antam Consolidated, Inc.v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-61523, 31 July 1986 FACTS: Stokely Van Camp. Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Indiana, U.S.A. with "Capital City Product Company" (Capital City) as one of its subdivisions. Stokely and Capital City were not engaged in business in the Philippines. Stokely and Capital filed a [...]

By |2020-02-28T07:56:23+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Antam Consolidated, Inc.v. Court of Appeals

The Home Insurance Company v. Eastern Shipping Lines

G.R. No.L-34382, 20 July 1983 FACTS: On or about January 13, 1967, S. Kajita & Co., on behalf of Atlas Consolidated Mining & Development Corporation, shipped on board the SS "Eastern Jupiter' from Osaka, Japan, 2,361 coils of "Black Hot Rolled Copper Wire Rods." The said VESSEL is owned and operated by defendant Eastern Shipping [...]

By |2020-02-28T07:54:48+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on The Home Insurance Company v. Eastern Shipping Lines

Tuna Processing, Inc. v. Philippine Kingford, Inc.

G.R. No. 185582, 29 February 2012 FACTS: On 14 January 2003, Kanemitsu Yamaoka (hereinafter referred to as the "licensor"), co-patentee of U.S. Patent No. 5,484,619, Philippine Letters Patent No. 31138, and Indonesian Patent No. ID0003911 (collectively referred to as the "Yamaoka Patent"), and five (5) Philippine tuna processors, namely, Angel Seafood Corporation, East Asia Fish [...]

By |2020-02-28T07:44:03+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Tuna Processing, Inc. v. Philippine Kingford, Inc.

Gelano v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-39050, 24 February 1981 FACTS: Private respondent Insular Sawmill, Inc. is a corporation organized on September 17, 1945 with a corporate life of fifty (50) years, or up to September 17, 1995, with the primary purpose of carrying on a general lumber and sawmill business. To carry on this business, private respondent leased [...]

By |2020-02-28T07:35:13+00:00February 6th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Gelano v. Court of Appeals

Spouses Hiteroza v. Cruzada

G.R. No. 203527, 28 September 2016 FACTS: Christ's Achievers Montessori Inc. is a non-stock, non-profit corporation that operates a school in San Jose del Monte, Bulacan. On February 25, 2010, the Sps. Hiteroza filed a Complaint for a derivative suit with prayer for the creation of a management committee, the appointment of a receiver, and [...]

By |2020-02-28T06:48:13+00:00February 5th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Spouses Hiteroza v. Cruzada

Alabang Development Corporation v. Alabang Hills Village Association

G.R. No. 187456, 2 June 2014 FACTS: The Complaint alleged that [petitioner] is the developer of Alabang Hills Village and still owns certain parcels of land therein that are yet to be sold, as well as those considered open spaces that have not yet been donated to [the] local government of Muntinlupa City or the [...]

By |2020-02-28T06:45:06+00:00February 5th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Alabang Development Corporation v. Alabang Hills Village Association

Vigilla, et al. v. Philippine College of Criminology, Inc.

G.R. No. 200094, 10 June 2013 FACTS: PCCr is a non-stock educational institution, while the petitioners were janitors, janitresses and supervisor in the Maintenance Department of PCCr under the supervision and control of Atty. Florante A. Seril (Atty. Seril), PCCr’s Senior Vice President for Administration. The petitioners, however, were made to understand, upon application with [...]

By |2020-06-06T09:08:11+00:00February 5th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Vigilla, et al. v. Philippine College of Criminology, Inc.
Go to Top