PNCC vs. CA

G.R. No. 116896, 5 May 1997 FACTS: On November 18, 1985, private respondents and petitioner entered into a contract of lease of a parcel of land owned by the former. The terms and conditions of said contract of lease are as follows: a) the lease shall be for a period of five (5) years which [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:12:29+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Trans-Pacific Industrial Supplies, Inc. v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 109172, 19 August 1994 FACTS: Petitioner applied for and grated financial accommodations by respondent bank. The loans were evidenced and secured by four (4) promissory notes, a real estate mortgage covering three parcels of land and a chattel mortgage over petitioner's stock and inventories.Unable to settle its obligation in full, petitioner requested for, [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:04:09+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Pakistan International Airlines v. Ople

G.R. No. 61594, 28 September 1990 FACTS: Pakistan International Airlines Corporation ("PIA"), a foreign corporation licensed to do business in the Philippines, executed in Manila two (2) separate contracts of employment, one with private respondent Ethelynne B. Farrales and the other with private respondent Ma. M.C. Mamasig. The contracts provided that (1) the Duration of [...]

By |2020-09-30T07:47:24+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|1 Comment

PNB v. CA

G.R. No. 108052, 24 July 1996 FACTS: PNB, herein petitioner, doubly credited the private respondent’s account erroneously. Petitioner then demanded the private respondent to return the amount in excess, equal to P34,340.58. Thereafter, remittances from abroad to the private respondent were coursed through petitioner PNB. Without his knowledge and consent, the bank deducted P34,340.58 from [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:09:02+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Bank of Philippine Islands v. Reyes

G.R. No. 116792, 29 March 1996 FACTS: On December 7, 1990, respondent Jesusa Reyes together with her daughter, went to BPI Zapote Branch to open an ATM account. Respondent informed one of petitioners employees, Mr. Capati, that they wanted to open an ATM account for the amount of P200,000.00, P100,000.00 of which shall be withdrawn [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:12:40+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Gan Tion v. CA

G.R. No. L-22490, 21 May 1969 FACTS: Ong Wan Sieng was a tenant in certain premises owned by Gan Tion. In 1961 the latter filed an ejectment case against the former, alleging non-payment of rents for August and September of that year, at P180 a month, or P360 altogether. The plaintiff obtained a favourable judgment [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:10:49+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

CKH Industrial Development Corp. v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 111890, 7 May 1997 FACTS:  The records disclose that petitioner CKH is the owner of two parcels of land, consisting of 4,590 sq. m. and 300 sq. m. respectively, located in Karuhatan, Valenzuela, and covered by Transfer Certificates of Title Nos. 8710 and 8711, Register of Deeds of Caloocan City (now Register of [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:47:03+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Bangko Sentral v. COA

G.R. No. 168964, 23 January 2006 FACTS: Recarredo Valenzuela was employed by the defunct Air Transportation Unit (ATU) of BSPs Security Investigation and Transportation Department (SITD). He executed a certification in his capacity as Administrative Services Officer II/Property Supply Officer, assuming responsibility over all the properties issued to the outgoing Chief Aircraft Maintenance Officer/PSO. Upon [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:47:10+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

California Bus Line v. State Investment

G.R. No. 147950, 11 December 2003 FACTS: Delta Motors Corporation M.A.N. Division (Delta) applied for financial assistance from respondent State Investment House, Inc. (hereafter SIHI) which the latter agreed to extend a credit line to Delta in three separate credit agreements. On several occasions, Delta availed of the credit line by discounting with SIHI some [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:30:38+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments
Go to Top