Lafarge Cement Phil v. Continental Cement

G.R. No. 155173, 23 November 2004 FACTS:  In the Letter of Intent (LOI) executed by both parties, Petitioner Lafarge Cement Philippines, Inc. on behalf of its affiliates and other qualified entities agreed to purchase the cement business of Respondent Continental Cement Corporation. Both parties entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement knowing that respondent has [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:20:32+00:00May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Capalla v. COMELEC

G.R. No. 201112, 23 October 2012 FACTS: The Comelec and Smartmatic-TIM entered into a Contract for the Provision of an Automated Election System for the May 10, 2010 Synchronized National and Local Elections (AES Contract) which is a Contract of Lease with Option to Purchase (OTP) the goods listed therein consisting of the Precinct Count [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:21:59+00:00May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Makati Dev’t Corp. v. Empire Insurance Co.

G.R. No. L-21780, 30 June 1967 FACTS:  On March 31, 1959, the Makati Development Corporation sold to Rodolfo P. Andal a lot. A so-called "special condition" contained in the deed of sale provides that "the VENDEE/S shall commence the construction and complete at least 50% of his/her/their/its residence on the property within two (2) years [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:53:21+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Country Bankers Insurance v. CA

G.R. No. 85161, 9 September 1991 FACTS: Sy (petitioner) leased theaters owned by Oscar Ventanilla Enterprises Corporation (OVEC) (respondent). Despite numerous demands and a supplemental agreement, Petitioner failed to pay the monthly rentals and amusement taxes as stipulated in their contract. Respondent thereafter repossessed said properties in accordance with their written agreement. Sy filed to [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:23:20+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Papa v. Valencia

G.R. No. 105188, 23 January 1998 FACTS: A parcel of land was allegedly sold to respondent Penarroyo by petitioner acting as attorney-in-fact of Anne Butte. The purchaser, through Valencia, made a check payment in the amount of P40,000 and in cash, P5,000. Both were accepted by petitioner as evidenced by various receipts. It appeared that [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:41:10+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

PAL v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-49188, 30 January 1990 FACTS: Amelia Tan was found to have been wronged by Philippine Air Lines (PAL). She filed her complaint in 1967. After ten (10) years of protracted litigation in the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeals, Ms. Tan won her case. Almost twenty-two (22) years later, Ms. [...]

By |2018-05-17T05:03:52+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Reparations Commission v. Universal Deep Sea Fishing

A.M. No. 21901-96, 27 June 1978 FACTS: Universal Deep Sea Fishing acquired 6 trawl boats by the Reparations Commission to be delivered two at a time and a Contract Purchase and Sale of Reparations Goods between the parties. The Manila Surety & Fidelity Co. Inc. was the surety of UNIVERSAL to indemnify the Reparations in [...]

By |2018-05-17T05:04:11+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Paculdo v. Regalado

G.R. No. 123855, 20 November 2000 FACTS: Petitioner Nereo Paculdo and respondent Bonifacio Regalado entered into a contract of lease over a parcel of land. Aside from the lease, petitioner leased eleven (11) other property from the respondent, ten (10) of which was located within the Fairview compound, while the eleventh was located along Quirino [...]

By |2018-05-17T05:12:31+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Development Bank of the Philippines v. Court of Appeal

G.R. No. 118342, 5 January 1998 FACTS: Juan B. Dans, together with his wife Candida, his son and daughter-in-law, applied for a loan of P500,000.00 with the Development Bank of the Philippine on May 1987. The loan was approved by the bank in August 1987 but in the reduced amount of P300,000. As the principal [...]

By |2018-05-17T05:12:14+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Filinvest Credit Corporation v. Philippine Acetylene

G.R. No. L-50449, 10 January 1982 FACTS: Philippine Acetylene Co., Inc. purchased from Alexander Lima motor vehicle described as Chevorlet 1969 model for P55,247.80 with a down payment of P20,000.00 and the balance of P35,247.80 payable, under the terms and conditions of the promissory note at a monthly installment of P1,036.70 for thirty-four (34) months, [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:27:42+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments
Go to Top