Carumba v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-27587, 18 February 1970, 31 SCRA 558 FACTS: On April 12, 1955, the spouses Amado Canuto and Nemesia Ibasco, by virtue of a "Deed of Sale of Unregistered Land with Covenants of Warranty" (Exh. A), sold a parcel of land, partly residential and partly coconut land with a periphery (area) of 359.09 square [...]

By |2020-02-21T07:21:09+00:00January 27th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Carumba v. Court of Appeals

Dela Merced v. GSIS

G.R. No. 167140, 23 November 2011, 365 SCRA 1 FACTS: This case involves five registered parcels of land located within the Antonio Subdivision, Pasig City – Lots 6, 7, 8, and 10 of Block 2 and Lot 8 of Block 8 (subject properties). These lots were originally owned by, and titled in the name of, [...]

By |2020-02-21T07:14:15+00:00January 27th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Dela Merced v. GSIS

Tañedo v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 104482, 22 January 1996 FACTS: Lazardo Tañedo executed a notarized deed of absolute sale in favor of his eldest brother, Ricardo Tañedo, and the latter's wife, Teresita Barera. Private respondents recorded the Deed of Sale in their favor in the Registry of Deeds and the corresponding entry was made in Transfer Certificate of [...]

By |2020-02-21T06:59:17+00:00January 27th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Tañedo v. Court of Appeals

Caram v. Laureta

G.R. No. L-28740, 24 February 1981, 103 SCRA 7 FACTS: Claro L. Laureta filed an action for nullity, recovery of ownership and/or reconveyance with damages and attorney's fees against Marcos Mata, Codidi Mata, Fermin Z. Caram, Jr. On June 10, 1945, Marcos Mata conveyed a large tract of agricultural land covered by Original Certificate of [...]

By |2020-06-04T08:25:09+00:00January 27th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Caram v. Laureta

Hanopol v. Pilapil

G.R. No. L-19248, 28 February 1963, 7 SCRA 452 FACTS: This is a case of double sale of the same parcel of unregistered land decided in favor of defendant-appellee Pilapil, originally appealed by plaintiff-appellant Hanopol to the CA, but later certified to this Court for proper adjudication, the issues involved being exclusively of law. Appellant [...]

By |2020-02-21T06:36:40+00:00January 27th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Hanopol v. Pilapil

Arcaina v. Ingram

G.R. No. 196444, 15 February 2017 FACTS: Arcaina is the owner of a parcel of land. Her attorney-in-fact, Banta, entered into a contract with Ingram for the sale of the property. Banta represented that the property has an area of more or less 6,200 square meters (sq.m.) per the tax declaration covering it. The contract [...]

By |2020-06-04T08:13:43+00:00January 24th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Arcaina v. Ingram

Roble v. Arbasa

362 SCRA 69 FACTS: Spouses Arbasa purchased from Fidela Roble a unregistered parcel of land. According to the deed of sale, the land had a total of 240 sqm. However, due to persistent efforts in reclaiming a portion of the sea, the land increased to 884 sqm. Since then the spouses were in continuous possession [...]

By |2020-02-21T06:30:37+00:00January 24th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Roble v. Arbasa

Semira v. Court of Appeals

230 SCRA 577 FACTS: Juana Guitierrez sold a parcel of land lot 4221, to Buenaventura by a deed of sale. In the deed,it was stated the estimated area of 822.5 square meters and the bounderies of the lot. Subsequently, Buenaventura sold the said lot to his nephew who in turn sold the lot to the [...]

By |2020-02-21T06:26:31+00:00January 24th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Semira v. Court of Appeals

Sta. Ana Jr. v. Hernandez

18 SCRA 973 FACTS: Spouses Jose Santa Ana, Jr. and Lourdes Sto. Domingo sold a land in Bulacan to respondent Rosa Hernandez for P11,000. The boundaries of the land were stated in the deed of sale and its approximate land area. After the sale (there were two other previous sales to different vendees of other [...]

By |2020-06-04T08:05:51+00:00January 24th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Sta. Ana Jr. v. Hernandez

Alliance Tobacco Corporation v. Philippine Virginia Tobacco

179 SCRA 336 FACTS: PVTA entered into a merchandising loan agreement with the petitioner in the amount of P25,500.00 for the purchase of flue-cured Virginia tobacco from bona fide Virginia tobacco former-producers. In the ensuing month, petitioner shipped to the Farmers Virginia Tobacco Redrying (FVTR) bales of tobacco. After several days, the grading of the [...]

By |2020-02-21T03:55:09+00:00January 24th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Alliance Tobacco Corporation v. Philippine Virginia Tobacco
Go to Top