Rivera v. Solidbank

G.R. No. 163269, 19 April 2006 FACTS: Petitioner had been working for Solidbank Corporation since July 1, 1977. In December 1994, Solidbank offered two retirement programs to its employees, the ORP and SRP. Petitioner applied for retirement under the SRP. Solidbank approved the application and gave petitioner the amount due to him. Rivera received the [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:49:22+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Cui v. Arellano University

G.R. No. L-15127, 30 May 1961 FACTS: Emetrio Cui took his preparatory law course at Arellano University.  He then enrolled in its College of Law from the first year until the first semester of his 4th year.  During these years, he was awarded scholarship grants of the said university amounting to a total of P1,033.87.  He [...]

By |2018-05-21T03:52:44+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Professional Academic Plans, Inc. Francisco Colayco and Benjamin Dino v. Crisostomo

G.R. No. 148599, 14 March 2005 FACTS: Respondent is an employee of petitioner. It was initially agreed in a MOA that respondent was to receive 10% commission on remittances of clients negotiated by her. Thereafter respondent negotiated a scholarship program between AFSLAI and PAPI. Sometime later, a series of new MOAs negotiated between AFSLAI and [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:52:46+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Florentino v. Encarnacion

G.R. No. L-27696, 30 September 1977 FACTS: On May 22, 1964, the petitioners-appellants and the petitioner-appellee filed with CFI an application for the registration under Act 496 of a parcel of agricultural land located at Cabugao, Ilocos Sur. The application alleged among other things that the applicants are the common and pro-indiviso owners in fee [...]

By |2018-05-17T07:03:04+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

DKC Holdings Corp. v. CA

G.R. No. 118248, 5 April 2000 FACTS: DKC Holdings Corporation entered into a Contract of Lease with Option to Buy with Encarnacion Bartolome, which option must be exercised within a period of two years counted from the signing of the Contract. In turn, DKC undertook to pay P3,000.00 a month as consideration for the reservation of its [...]

By |2018-05-17T07:03:10+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Coquia v. Fieldmen’s Insurance Co.

G.R. No. L-23276, 29 November 1968 FACTS: The Fieldmen’s Company (company) issued a common carrier accident insurance policy to Manila Yellow Taxicab Co. Inc. (insured). In the policy it stipulated that accident arising from a motor vehicle shall be insured with respect to the death or bodily injured driver, conductor and/or inspector riding in the [...]

By |2018-08-04T05:33:21+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Constantino v. Espiritu

G.R. No. L-22404, 31 May 1971 FACTS: The deed of absolute sale as the binding contract between appellant and appellee conveyed the two storey house in favor of the appellee. The appellee is entrusted of the properties of the appellant’s illegitimate son. The appellee mortgaged the said property to Republic Savings Bank for the payment [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:55:00+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Arroyo v. Berwin

G.R. No. L-10551, 3 March 1917 FACTS: Defendant represented Marcela Juanesa in the justice of the peace court of Iloilo in proceeding for theft prosecuted by the plaintiff Ignacio Arroyo. The defendant requested the plaintiff to agree to dismiss the said criminal proceeding, that his client Marcela Juaneza would recognize the plaintiff's ownership in the [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:56:49+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Bustamante v. Rosel

G.R. No. 126800, 29 November 1999 FACTS: Petitioner entered into a loan agreement with the respondent wherein the former as the borrower and the latter as the lender. The loan was secured by a parcel of land of the petitioner as a collateral. In their agreement, it was stated that in the event that if [...]

By |2018-05-17T06:56:35+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Corpuz v. CA and David

G.R. No. L-40424, 30 June 1980 FACTS: The defendant was charged administratively by several employees of the Central Bank Export Department of which the defendant is the director. Pending the investigation, he was suspended from office. After the investigating committee found the administrative charges to be without merit, and subsequently recommended the immediate reinstatement of [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:52:53+00:00May 15th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments
Go to Top