Africa, et al. v. Caltex Phils

G.R. No. L-12986, March 31, 1966, 16 SCRA 448 FACTS: On March 18, 1948 a fire broke out at the Caltex service station at the corner of Antipolo street and Rizal Avenue, Manila St. all started while a gasoline was being hosed from a tank truck into the underground storage, right at the opening of [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:19:23+00:00June 6th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Cangco v. Manila Railroad Co.

G.R. No. L-12191, 14 October 1918 FACTS: Jose Cangco was in the employment of Manila Railroad Company. He lived in the pueblo of San Mateo, in the province of Rizal, which is located upon the line of the defendant railroad company; and in coming daily by train to the company's office in the city of [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:19:32+00:00June 6th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Geraldez, vs. CA & Kenstar Travel Corporation

G.R. No. 108253, February 23, 1994 FACTS: Petitioner Geraldez filed an action for damages by reason of contractual breach against respondent Kenstar Travel Corp. Petitioner booked the Volare 3 tour with Kenstar. The tour covered a 22-day tour of Europe for $2,990.00 which she paid the total equivalent amount of P190,000.00 charged by private respondent [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:19:40+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Woodhouse v Halili

July 31, 1953, 93 Phil. 526 FACTS: On November 29, 1947, plaintiff Woodhouse entered into a written agreement with defendant Halili for a partnership for the bottling and distribution of Mission soft drinks, plaintiff to act as industrial partner or manager, and the defendant as a capitalist. The plaintiff was to secure the Mission Soft [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:19:47+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Song Fo & Company vs Hawaiian Philippine Co.

G.R. No. 23769 - September 16, 1925 FACTS: Hawaiian-Philippine Co (HPC) entered into a contract with Song Fo and Co (SFC) where it would deliver molasses to the latter evidenced by a letter containing their contract. The same states that Mr. Song Fo agreed to the delivery of 300,000 gallons of molasses and the same [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:19:54+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Central Bank v. CA

G.R. No. L-45710, October 3, 1985, 139 SCRA 46 FACTS: On April 28, 1965, Island Savings Bank, upon favorable recommendation of its legal department, approved the loan application for P80,000.00 of Sulpicio M. Tolentino, who, as a security for the loan, executed on the same day a real estate mortgage over his 100-hectare land located [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:20:01+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Tengco v. CA

G.R. No. 49852, October 18, 1989, 178 SCRA 608 FACTS: On 16 September 1976, the herein private respondent, Benjamin Cifra, Jr., claiming to be the owner of the premises in Navotas, Metro Manila, which he had leased to the herein petitioner, Emilia Tengco, filed an action for unlawful detainer, to evict the petitioner, from the [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:20:08+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Abella v. Francisco

55 Phil. 447 (1931) FACTS: Defendant Guillermo B. Francisco purchased from the Government on installments, lots 937 to 945 of the Tala Estate in Novaliches, Caloocan, Rizal. He was in arrears for some of these installments. On the 31st of October, 1928, he signed a document acknowledging payment of P500 and the balance to be [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:20:16+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Cetus Development, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 77648, August 7, 1989, 176 SCRA 72 FACTS: The private respondents were the lessees of the premises originally owned by the Susana Realty. These individual verbal leases were on a month-to-month basis and were paying to a collector of the Susana Realty who went to the premises monthly. Sometime on March 1984, Susana [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:20:28+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Jacinto Tanguilig vs Court of Appeals and Vicente Herce Jr.

G.R.No. 125994 29 June 2001 FACTS: Herce contracted Tanguilig to construct a windmill system for him, for consideration of 60,000.00. Pursuant to the agreement Herce paid the downpayment of 30,000.00 and installment of 15,000.00 leaving a 15,000.00 balance. Herce refused to pay the balance because he had already paid this amount to SPGMI which constructed [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:20:23+00:00June 5th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments
Go to Top