Dignos v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-59266, 29 February 1988, 158 SCRA 375 FACTS: The Dignos spouses were owners of a parcel of land, known as Lot No. 3453. On June 7, 1965, petitioners Dignos spouses sold the said parcel of land to respondent Atilano J. Jabil for the sum of P28,000.00, payable in two installments, with an assumption [...]

By |2020-02-20T07:48:21+00:00February 20th, 2020|Case Digests|0 Comments

Provident International Resources Corporation v. Venus

G.R. No. 167041, 17 June 2008 FACTS: Another group, known as the Asistio group, composed of Luis A. Asistio, Lazaro L. Madara, Alfredo D. Roa III, Joaquin T. Venus, and Jose Ma. Carlos L. Zumel, claimed that the Marcelo group acquired shares in PIRC as mere trustees for the Asistio group. The Marcelo group allegedly [...]

By |2020-02-28T08:29:19+00:00February 18th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Provident International Resources Corporation v. Venus

Estanislao v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-49982, 27 April 1988 FACTS: Petitioner and private respondents are brothers and sisters who are co-owners of certain lots at the corner of Annapolis and Aurora Blvd which were then being leased to Shell. They agreed to open and operate a gas station with an initial investment of P 15,000.00 to be taken [...]

By |2020-03-02T05:33:08+00:00February 18th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Estanislao v. Court of Appeals

Santos v. Spouses Reyes

G.R. No. 135813, 25 October 2001 FACTS: Sometime in June, 1986, Petitioner Fernando Santos and Respondent Nieves Reyes were introduced to each other by one Meliton Zabat regarding a lending business venture proposed by Nieves. It was verbally agreed that petitioner would act as financier while Nieves and Zabat would take charge of solicitation of [...]

By |2020-03-02T05:26:16+00:00February 18th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Santos v. Spouses Reyes

Sy v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 94285, 31 August 1999 FACTS: Sy Yong Hu & Sons is a partnership between Sy Yong Hu and his sons. Their shares as reflected in the Amended articles of partnership are as follows: Sy Yong Hu (31k), Jose Sy (205k), Jayme Sy (112k), Marciano Sy (143k), Willie Sy (85k), Vicente Sy (85k), and [...]

By |2020-06-02T08:45:28+00:00February 18th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Sy v. Court of Appeals

Eugenio v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 103737, 15 December 1994 FACTS: Petitioner Nora S. Eugenio was a dealer of the soft drink products of private respondent corporation Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of the Philippines, Inc.. Private respondent filed a complaint for a sum of money against petitioners alleging that petitioners purchased and received on credit various products in a total [...]

By |2020-03-02T08:09:25+00:00February 17th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Eugenio v. Court of Appeals

Bacaltos Coal Mines v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 114091, 29 June 1995 FACTS: Under and by virtue of an Authorization issued by GERMAN A. BACALTOS to RENE ROSEL SAVELLON, the Trip Charter Party was executed "by and between BACALTOS COAL MINES, represented ... by its Chief Operating Officer, RENE ROSEL SAVELLON" and private respondent San Miguel Corporation (hereinafter SMC). Thereunder, Savellon [...]

By |2020-03-02T08:06:58+00:00February 17th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Bacaltos Coal Mines v. Court of Appeals

Adriano v. Pangilinan

G.R. No. 137471, 16 January 2002 FACTS: Adriano is the registered owner of a parcel of land. Sometime on 1990, petitioner entrusted the original owner’s copy of the TCT to Salvador, a distant relative, for the purpose of securing a mortgage loan. Thereafter without the knowledge and consent of Adriano, Salvador mortgaged the property to [...]

By |2020-03-11T06:17:12+00:00February 17th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Adriano v. Pangilinan

Siasat v. Intermediate Appellate Court

G.R. No. L-67889, 10 October 1985 FACTS: Respondent Nacianceno succeeded in convincing officials of then DECS to purchase, without public bidding, one million pesos worth of national flags for the use of public schools throughout the country. And for her service, she was entitled to a commission of thirty (30%) percent. The first delivery was [...]

By |2020-03-02T06:54:36+00:00February 17th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Siasat v. Intermediate Appellate Court

Conde v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. L-40242, 15 December 1982 FACTS: On April 7, 19311, Margarita, Bernardo and petitioner Dommga, all surnamed Conde, (the vendors-a-retro) sold with right of repurchase within ten years from said date, an unregistered parcel of agricultural land, to the spouses Casimira Pasagui and Pio Altera (the vendees-a-retro). Three years later, Original Certificate of Title [...]

By |2020-03-02T06:39:08+00:00February 17th, 2020|Case Digests|Comments Off on Conde v. Court of Appeals
Go to Top