PADCOM v. Ortigas

G.R. No. 146807, May 9, 2002, 382 SCRA 222 FACTS: Petitioner Padcom Condominium Corporation owns and manage the Padilla Office Condominium Building (PADCOM BUILDING). The land on which the building stands was originally acquired from the Ortigas & Company, Limited Partnership, by Tierra Development Corporation (TDC) under a Deed of Sale with a condition that [...]

By | 2018-06-04T02:40:38+00:00 June 4th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments


GR No. 177056 - Sept 18, 2009 FACTS: Respondents operate or lease out shopping malls that have parking facilities. The people that use said facilities are required to pay parking fees by the respondents. Senate committees conducted an investigation to determine the legality of said practice which the same found to be against the National [...]

By | 2018-06-04T09:18:39+00:00 June 4th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Quiombing v. CA

G.R. No. 93010, 30 August 1990 FACTS: On August 30, 1983, Nicencio Tan Quiombing and Dante Biscocho, as the First Party, jointly and severally bound themselves in a "Construction and Service Agreement" to construct a house for private respondents Francisco and Manuelita Saligo, as the Second Party, for the contract price of P137,940.00, which the [...]

By | 2018-06-04T02:05:56+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Inciong v. CA

G.R. No. 96405, 26 June 1996 FACTS: In February 1983, Rene Naybe took out a loan from Philippine Bank of Communications (PBC) in the amount of P50k. For that he executed a promissory note in the same amount. Naybe was able to convince Baldomero Inciong, Jr. and Gregorio Pantanosas to co-sign with him as co-makers. [...]

By | 2018-05-17T08:29:08+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Araneta v. Philippine Sugar Estate Development Co.

G.R. No. L-22558, 31 May 1967 FACTS: J.M. Tuason & Co., Inc. through Gregorio Araneta, Inc. sold a portion of their land to Philippine Sugar Estates Development with a condition that the buyer will build a church in the said land while the seller will construct a street within the property. The buyer had already [...]

By | 2018-05-17T08:29:23+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Buce v. CA

G.R. No. 136913, 12 May 2000 FACTS: Petitioner Anita Buce leased a 56 square meter of land located at Quirino Avenue, Pandacan, Manila. The lease was for a period of 15 years to commence on June 1, 1979 and subject to renewal for another 10 years, under the same terms and conditions. Respondent Jose Tiongco, [...]

By | 2018-05-17T03:41:29+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Arco Pulp and Paper Co, v. Lim

G.R. No. 206806, 25 June 2014 FACTS: Lim works in the business of supplying scrap papers, cartons, and other raw materials, under the name Quality Paper and Plastic Products, Enterprises, to factories engaged in the paper mill business. Lim delivered scrap papers to Arco Pulp and Paper Company, Inc. The parties allegedly agreed that Arco [...]

By | 2018-05-17T08:31:28+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Inchausti v. Yulo

G.R. No. L-7721, 25 March 1914 FACTS:            This suit is brought for the recovery of a certain sum of money, the balance of a current account opened by the firm of Inchausti & Company with Teodor Yulo and after his death continued by Gregorio Yulo as principal representative of his children. On Aug.12, 1909, Gregorio [...]

By | 2018-05-17T08:31:45+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Alipio v. CA

G.R. No. 134100, 29 September 2000 FACTS: (1) Respondent Romeo Jaring was the lessee of a 14.5 hectare fishpond in Barito, Mabuco, Hermosa, Bataan. The lease was for a period of five years ending on September 12, 1990. On June 19, 1987, he subleased the fishpond, for the remaining period of his lease, to the [...]

By | 2018-05-17T03:51:32+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Vigilla v. Phil. College of Criminology, Inc.

G.R. 200094, 10 June 2013 FACTS: The petitioners work for the Philippine College of Criminology Inc. (PCCr) as janitors, janitress, and supervisor in its maintenance department. The petitioners were made to understand by the respondent PCCr that they are under the Metropolitan Building Services, Inc. (MBMSI) which is a corporation engaged in providing janitorial services. [...]

By | 2018-05-17T03:44:55+00:00 May 17th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments