About jurist

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far jurist has created 370 blog entries.

Angeles v. Calasanz

G.R. No. L-42283, March 18, 1985, 135 SCRA 323 FACTS: Ursula and Tomas Calasanz sold a piece of land to Buenaventura Angeles and Teofila Juani covered by a contract to sell. Angeles paid a down payment upon the execution of the contract and started paying the balance in monthly installments for nine years with only [...]

By |2018-08-06T01:15:14+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

UP vs. De Los Angeles

G.R. No. L-28602, 29 September 1970 FACTS: Petitioner and respondent ALUMCO entered into a logging agreement under which the latter was granted exclusive authority, for a period starting from the date of the agreement to 31 December 1965, extendible for a further period of five (5) years by mutual agreement, to cut, collect and remove [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:11:25+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

De Erquiaga v. CA

G.R. No. 47206, September 27, 1989, 178 SCRA 1 FACTS: Santiago de Erquiaga was the owner of 100% or 3,100 paid-up shares of stock of the Erquiaga Development Corporation (EDC) which owns the Hacienda San Jose in Irosin, Sorsogon. On November 4, 1968, he entered into an Agreement with Jose L. Reynoso to sell to [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:11:36+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Int’l Hotel Corp v. Joaquin, Jr.

G.R. No. 158361, April 10, 2013 FACTS: On February 1, 1969, respondent Francisco B. Joaquin, Jr. submitted a proposal to International Hotel Corporation (IHC) for him to render technical assistance in securing a foreign loan for the construction of a hotel, to be guaranteed DBP. The proposal encompassed nine phases. The IHC Board of Directors [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:11:45+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Herrera v. Leviste

G.R. No. 55744, February 28, 1985 FACTS: Leviste obtained a loan from the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) in the amount of P1,854,311.50. As security therefore, Leviste mortgaged two (2) lots, one located at Parañaque (the Parañaque Property), and the other located at Buendia Avenue, Makati. Leviste sold to Petitioner, Jose V. Herrera, the Buendia [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:31:20+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Heirs of San Miguel v. CA

G.R. No. 136054, September 05, 2001 FACTS: A parcel of land originally claimed by Severina San Miguel was divided into three (3) lots by Dominador without Severina’s knowledge. Dominador, et al. filed a petition with the Court of First Instance, Caviteto issue title over Lots 1 and 2 in their names and a decision directing [...]

By |2018-07-16T05:30:39+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila v. CA

G.R. No. 77425, June 19, 1991, 198 SCRA 300 FACTS: The administrators of the estate of deceased spouses Eusebioand Martina De Castro filed a complaint to nullify the deed of donation, rescission of contract, and reconveyance of the property against spouses Florencio and Soledad Ignao, Roman Catholic Bishop of Imus, and Roman Catholic Archbishop of [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:12:06+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Romero vs. CA

G.R. No. 107207, November 23, 1995 FACTS: Petitioner Virgilio Romero a civil engineer together with his foreign partners wants to put up a Central Warehouse in Metro Manila. Alfonso Flores and his wife accompanied by a broker, offered a parcel of land measuring 1,952 square meters, owned by the private respondent Enriqueta Chua vda. De [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:12:13+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Rustan Pulp and Paper Mills v. IAC

G. R. No. 70789, 19 October 1992 FACTS: Petitioner Rustan established a pulp and paper mill in Baloi, Lano del Norte. Respondent Lluch, who is a holder of a forest products license, transmitted a letter to petitioner Rustan for the supply of raw materials by the former to the latter. In their contract it stated [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:12:20+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments

Taylor v. Uy Tieng Piao

43 Phil. 873 (1922) FACTS: On December 12, 1918, the plaintiff contracted his services to Tan Liuan and Co., as superintendent of an oil factory which the latter contemplated establishing in this city. The period of the contract extended over two years from the date mentioned; and the salary was to be at the rate [...]

By |2018-07-06T03:12:28+00:00June 11th, 2018|Case Digests|0 Comments